AB 375 in Los Angeles is reshaping how food delivery accidents are handled in California. Whether you were injured by a DoorDash, Uber Eats, or Grubhub driver, this new law has major implications for how claims are filed and who can be held liable. If you’ve been hit by a delivery driver in LA, here’s what you need to know to protect your rights and recover compensation.
California Assembly Bill 375, passed in 2024, introduces new standards for employment classification for food delivery workers. The law is part of an ongoing battle between labor rights advocates and gig economy platforms. Under AB 375, food delivery drivers are more likely to be classified as employees rather than independent contractors — especially when it comes to insurance and liability coverage in the event of an accident.
Los Angeles has one of the largest food delivery markets in the U.S., with thousands of delivery drivers on the roads daily. These drivers are often under pressure to meet tight delivery deadlines, increasing the risk of traffic violations and collisions. When an accident happens, victims are often unsure whether to file against the driver, the platform, or their own insurance. AB 375 provides clearer guidance on this issue.
Prior to AB 375, platforms like Uber Eats and DoorDash often avoided direct liability by classifying drivers as independent contractors. This meant accident victims had limited access to the company’s insurance policies. Under AB 375, if a driver is deemed an employee during work-related tasks, the platform may now be held liable for injuries, medical bills, and other damages caused during a delivery.
In 2025, a cyclist in downtown Los Angeles was struck by a Grubhub driver who ran a red light while making a delivery. Before AB 375, the cyclist would likely only be able to file a claim against the driver’s personal auto insurance. Now, if the driver is considered an employee under AB 375, Grubhub may be responsible for compensating the injured cyclist through its corporate insurance policy.
For people injured in food delivery accidents, AB 375 increases the likelihood of recovering full compensation. If the platform is deemed responsible, its commercial policy can offer higher coverage limits than a personal auto policy. This includes reimbursement for:
If you or someone you love was injured by a food delivery driver in Los Angeles, ANTN LAW can help you understand your rights under AB 375. Led by attorney Arpine Navasardyan, our firm specializes in personal injury cases involving gig economy drivers and changing labor laws.
We offer a free consultation to evaluate your case and explain how AB 375 might increase your compensation. Don’t wait — California’s statute of limitations for injury claims is generally two years.
AB 375 is a California law that changes how food delivery drivers are classified for employment and insurance purposes.
Yes. All food delivery platforms operating in California are affected by AB 375.
If the driver was considered an employee and was working at the time, you may be able to sue the company directly.
Yes. AB 375 requires platforms to provide commercial insurance for their drivers.
No. It applies to incidents that occur after the law’s effective date in 2024.
Medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and property damage.
Generally, two years from the date of the accident, but exceptions may apply.
The platform’s commercial policy may cover your damages under AB 375.
Not necessarily. Each case is evaluated based on the criteria in the law.
Visit California Legislative Information to view the full text of AB 375.
Then their personal auto insurance may apply instead of the platform’s policy.
It depends on the facts, but AB 375 makes it easier to prove liability in many cases.
You can, but it’s highly recommended to consult a personal injury attorney, especially under new legislation like AB 375.
No, it specifically targets food delivery services, though similar regulations may follow for rideshare drivers.
